Reading time: 896 words, 3 pages, 2 to 4 minutes plus video.
Our hearts are with the people in Paris for the terrible Friday 13th massacre claimed by ISIS. Notice I said “claimed” as we still have much to learn as more evidence comes to light.
The conspiracy theorists are claiming this is a false flag or a staged event. Long time readers know I’m immune to knee-jerk conspiracy theories as I’ve written extensively about The Basis of Conspiracy Thinking.
The Powers-That-Be (TPTB) didn’t have to do much to create this attack on Paris except allow millions of Muslim refugees into Europe which no doubt included a small minority of radical terrorists and the rest, as they say, is history. Everyone is shooting in the dark (no pun intended). Zero Hedge reports, The False Flag Link: Passport “Found” Next To Suicide Bomber Was “Definitely A Forgery” which proves nothing. Paul Craig Roberts asks, Another Paris False Flag Attack? as does Veterans Today.
Canada is now more vulnerable to such a terrorist attack for several reasons:
a) One of the first announcements made by our newly elected Prime Minister, our ‘Boy Blunder’, is the withdrawal of Canada’s aging CF-18 fighter jets from the unwinnable war against Syria – oops, I mean against ISIS in Syria. TPTB tend to punish those who refuse to support their criminal activities consequently a so-called terrorist attack on innocent Canadians would not be out of the question.
b) Another of his early announcements is the rapid acceptance of 25,000 Muslim refugees. Other brainless politicos want to raise the number to 50,000. Today’s CBC national radio news reported that many agencies are aghast at the haste, lack of communication and ill-preparedness of this refugee effort. In other words, the vetting will be incompetent. In other words, many radicals and terrorists will slip into Canada.
c) Canada, for better or worse, is married to this unholy Anglo-Amerikan alliance and will encourage such an attack for reasons explained in the following video.
Gearoid O’Colmain, in a hard-hitting interview on RT (Russia Today) provides an excellent explanation of our so-called ‘War on Terror’, what I call our Forever War. Best see it soon before it gets pulled for revealing what the TPTB don’t want us to know.
Here are some brief points covered in the video if and when it gets ‘pulled’.
– The propaganda makes people fearful going out in the streets thus reducing the likelihood of protests and demonstrations.
– Attacks on Syrian civilians are orchestrated by NATO and the Anglo-Amerikan alliance.
– This global war on civilians is neocolonialism designed to divide, conquer and force submission to a new global order that serves only the interests of TPTB.
– There is no war on terror! It’s a Forever War using terrorist proxies funded and trained by western intelligence agencies against nations resisting Amerikan & IsraHELLi hegemony.
– Russia’s destruction of ISIS and declassified US documents from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) show that ISIS is a creation of the US, funded by Saudi Arabia and trained by IsraHELL.
– ISIS forces coming into Europe disguised as refugees will destabilize central Europe and enable the French government to step up its war efforts against Syria.
– There are no “moderate” rebels in Syria!
– Governments will crack down on dissenters and the alternative media. A French teacher was fired for suggesting there’s a link between French imperialism and terrorism.
Much is heard about so many of the Muslim refugees being young men as if this makes them all terrorists. Although a minority may be radical, young males are typical of the first wave of refugees. Being young and single, they have fewer ties to bind them. Also, they’re apprehensive about being involuntarily recruited into militant groups. Once established, they then call on the rest of their families to join them.
Come to think of it, that’s how I immigrated to Canada at the age of four. My father, as a young man, left for Canada, established himself, found a job and a place to stay before calling on his family to join him in this, our new home.
So what can you do to avoid terrorist attacks? There is no definite way to avoid a terrorist attack, but you can take precautions to decrease your chances of an attack and there are things you can do if you’re involved in an attack.
– First, don’t be afraid because you can bet the ass media will turn this into another fearful boogey-man, but do be careful.
– Remember, you still have a greater chance of dying in a car accident than by a terrorist.
– Increase your situational awareness. Look up occasionally from your stupid smartphone and be aware of your surroundings. And, if something doesn’t feel right, get outa there!
– See THIS and THIS for travelling abroad.
– See THIS and THIS if you ARE involved in a terrorist attack.
– And see THIS if you’re involved in an attack at a shopping mall.
Lastly, remember the words of Franklin D. Roosevelt, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts …”
November 15, 2015
<strong>Your comments are welcome! </strong>
If you like what you’ve read (or not) please “Rate This” below.
Style has always been much more important than substance as best illustrated by JFK. If you were trying to damage a country economically or militarily you would attack critical infrastructure not rock concerts, sports events and restaurants.
The Japanese would have done much more damage at Pearl Harbor if they had attack fuel depots, dry docks and maintenance facilities rather than obsolete Battleships. The Aircraft Carriers “just happened to be” out to sea. This was Japan’s mistake but illustrates the importance of target selection.
If four of the six major oil refineries on the east coast had been hit rather than office buildings it would have caused significant consternation. If refineries or infrastructure had been hit on 911 it would not have attracted the Media or political bloviating as killing innocent Americans did. Yet we can kill hundreds of thousands of non-combatants and few care.
Roy, you have an interesting perspective.
In ‘form vs function’ you’re saying that function is more important the form. I agree which is why the form (you call style) indicates these actions were meant to get media coverage and public reaction rather than strategic effect.
I had never considered that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I’ll keep that in mind in future.
I am reminded of Goering’s statement at Nurnberg which I don’t have a copy to post. He stated in essence the best a boy could hope for was to return in one piece but was stampeded by the politicians to be altruistic and sacrifice for the collective.
Lincoln maneuvered the Confederacy into attacking Fort Sumter and got his war.
The Battleship Maine blew up from spontaneous combustion and William Randolph Hurst told his reporter, “Send me a picture and I’ll give you a war.” This set the standard for Anglo-American journalism and gave McKinley his war.
After fair warning the Germans sank the armament carrying passenger Lusitania in May of 1915. In 1916 Wilson ran on the platform of “He kept us out of the war”. In 1917 he was pressured by his Rothschild handlers to save the Bank of England by tipping the balance of the war. So almost two years after the sinking of the Lusitania the short memory Yankee’s gave Wilson his war.
FDR through sanctions and embargos maneuvered the Japanese into attacking the US forcing the Germans to honor their treaty and declare war on the US. FDR got his war.
The Gulf of Tonkin gave LBJ his war.
911 gave Bush II his war.
Will Terror in Paris give Obama another war?
Good points, Roy.
As to your question: Obama doesn’t need an excuse for another war. He’s been pushing the Europeans to start one with Russia which is typical Amerikan cowardice. Look at WW II that started in 1939 and ended in 1945. The Amerikans showed up in 1944 to fight 15 year-olds and senior citizens while the Soviets decimated Germany’s finest fighting force on the Eastern front at a cost of 20 million of their own.
Hollywood pretends Amerika won the war, but it was the Soviets that did. All the Americans did was mop up.
So far, the Europeans have refused to oblige Obama’s failed foreign policy although they are helping the U.S. murder brown people in the Mid-East. So far …
Actually the US showed up in1942 in North Africa and the invasion of France should have never happened. The allies should have run up Italy, the soft underbelly of Europe. Eisenhower was much more of a bureaucrat than a military leader. He was picked by FDR over more senior officers because he was primarily a politician and would cater to FDR.
Russia won the European war and the US Navy won the Pacific war with the decisive battles being Stalingrad and Midway. The Nuremburg trials were revenge show trials. If the tenants of the trials were observed ever US President since and including Truman would have been hung.
What scares me is proxy wars where “God’s chosen people” tell the US “Lets you and him fight” doing “God’s work for us.
The worst would have been Eisenhower who murdered 2 million German POW’s in the 2 years after the war (“Necessary Losses” – James Bacque) and 5 million German civilians in the 5 years after the war (“Crimes and Mercies – same author) a revenge that few know.
However we both know that today it’s the Chosenites controlling events behind the scenes with the military might of the U.S. armed forces at their command.
Ain’t the world a lovely place circling ever closer to the drain?