Reading time: 1,321 words, 3 to 5 minutes
An interesting meme (social theme) is emerging lately questioning the value of a university education. Admittedly, there have always been questions about this but; the issue has taken on greater importance lately. The “Occupy Wall Street” movement is partly responsible for the emergence of this meme.
It seems a lot of students are starting to feel they have been sold a bill of goods. Get a university education, get a well-paying job, pay off your exorbitant student loan and live the good life. If you aren’t the least bit skeptical about that last sentence, you might have fallen for this gambit as well.
It’s true that university graduates earn more than those with a high school diploma who, in turn, earn more than high school drop-outs. This, however is a statistical average and doesn’t account for some very interesting exceptions such as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. And, it’s probably truer historically than it is today; 5 years into our Greater Depression That-No-One-Admits-To (TNOAT) and will likely continue for another 15 years or longer if the last two Great Depressions are anything to go by (1873 – 1896, 1930 – 1947).
In our Greater Depression TNOAT, youth unemployment is very high (another testament to the Greater Depression TNOAT). Good jobs are hard to come by because most western economies are ailing. And, exacerbating this youth unemployment is an aging boomer generation that is reluctant and, in many cases, financially unable to retire and open positions for the young.
.
An ailing economy’s stubborn refusal to emerge from the last downturn has decimated jobs. Consequently, many recent university graduates are unemployed and doubting the benefits of a university education.
.
A truism I just invented (I doubt I’m the first) is that humans have much difficulty determining cause and effect. Quite often people mistake results or symptoms as a root cause. That being the case, many recent graduates disparage their university degrees because they cannot find gainful employment. However, that is a reflection of our economy and the Greater Depression TNOAT and not a reflection of a university education. They may have acquired university degrees but that doesn’t mean they acquired critical thinking skills. It may also be a reflection of our dumbed-down education systems. And, don’t let me start ranting about the boob tube.
Even such stalwarts as Doug Casey, whose libertarian ideas I admire, has very little appreciation of a university education. However, Doug doesn’t realize how much of an autodidact (self-taught) that he is. I am blessed with an imagination where I can see how things are not and I can imagine how things could have been. I can imagine how Doug, with his intelligence and skepticism would have been even more brilliant under the tutelage of excellent professors. We’ll never know how much so.
Even Casey Research’s Gary Gibson believes that only the “hard sciences” are worthwhile and remunerative. However, one reader commented that the training that engineers and scientists get is not a true “education” but more of an apprenticeship. Higher education teaches critical, analytical and skeptical thinking skills that are not necessary for engineers and most scientists with the exception of research science.
One of the goals of the Occupy Wall Street movement is for the government to forgive their student loans. Good luck with that. I’m still wondering about the sanity of those who take on a $100,000 student loan regardless of the economic climate.
However, until this OWS movement, I’ve never known anyone who regretted their university education. My experience has been that those who disparage university fall into one of two categories:
1) Those who do not have a university degree I suspect may be blessed with a mixture of both ignorance and envy.
2) Those who are not capable of acquiring a university degree or who dropped out, I suspect they may have a case of sour grapes.
This is in no way meant to disrespect those lacking a university education. A degree takes a lot of money and time. University was never meant for everyone. Many jobs require training but not education. You don’t need a PHD to fly an aircraft but passengers certainly appreciate a pilot with considerable flight training. I doubt a garbage collector with a university degree would make a happy worker but I could be wrong. A degree may benefit him personally but I doubt it would help him do his job or give him much job satisfaction. It’s been said that an unexamined life is not worth living but, I suspect some people avoid looking too deeply for fear of finding nothing.
The main purpose of Primary and Secondary (High School) education aside from teaching the basics like reading, writing and arithmetic is to teach us how to learn. Aside from the basics, it matters little what we learn because we’ll forget most of it anyway. Learning how to learn is important because we spend the rest of our lives learning.
The main purpose of a liberal arts/humanities university education is learning how to think; not WHAT to think but, HOW to think by which I mean critical thinking, analytical thinking and skepticism. This is important because we spend the rest of our lives inundated with ideologies, slogans, propaganda, myths, religion, advertising, statistics, mass media, politicians and shysters trying to take advantage of us. We need to be able to discern fact from fiction, reality from fantasy and beneficial from harmful intent.
Higher education is an expensive luxury. I will never regret my liberal arts education even if it never makes me another nickel because it has taught me how to think. I do not regret being able to think. It’s been said the world is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel. I’d rather laugh than cry.
Although a Bachelor’s degree is the new High School diploma, many employers insist on a university degree because it shows the applicant is trainable. And, in today’s complex and fast changing world, if you have a job where you aren’t constantly learning something new then your job will either become obsolete or replaced by a robot.
Gerold
October 29, 2011
Postscript – much has been written about Steve Jobs since he died. Yes, he died. He didn’t “pass” or some such stupid euphemism. Politically correct euphemisms disgust me. You pass a grade in school or you pass a car on the highway. You don’t pass gas; you fart. And you don’t pass away; you die. People who are afraid to face themselves and life (or death) use euphemisms to bury their head in the sand.
Steve Jobs faced life head on and he wasn’t afraid to fail. Although he was a university drop-out, he valued the liberal arts and the humanities. Paul Wells of Macleans magazine “Freedom to fail is what made Steve Jobs” Oct. 24, 2011 where he comments on Jobs marrying technology with the liberal arts that made Apple successful. Wells said, “It was a direct rebuttal to Bill Gates’ belief that schools should aim to educate students in fields that ‘produce jobs’. Jobs believed rightly that nobody could know anymore at 20 which field will ‘produce jobs’ when he’s 40, so it’s better to just try to become a good person, in the way Aristotle would have understood that term.”
I too, agree with Steve Jobs. If you want to pursue an education that produces jobs, learn a trade. Demographics and retiring Boomers will rewards the trades. However, if you aren’t sure about the future, get an education that trains your mind to be open and flexible and you’ll not only learn what you love but you’ll be able to roll with the punches as well as identifying and capitalizing on the opportunities that arise.
Your comments are WELCOME!
If you like what you’ve read or not, please “Rate This” below.
Lengthy comments may time-out before you’re finished so consider doing them in a word doc first then copy and paste to “Leave a Reply” below.
Much as I agree with your post, there are, however, a few viewpoints I wish to exchange.
Learning how to think in a critical and analytical way is obviously one of the most important skills in life. Unfortunately, I don’t think (it’s not objective, I admit) there is an effective method to teach students these abilities. Just think about it, of those people go to the university, how many of them actually learned how to think? It’s very difficult to have the exact number for there is no way to know if the person had learned how to think or not. Then again, just look at how brilliant the leaders of the world are and we can at least be convinced that even the education from the most prestige university doesn’t help much when it comes to making the right decisions. But please don’t feel so bad for your country. In my country our government is still busy raising the flag of the Communist Party and let’s say nothing about the Middle East where the word of their God is still held sacred in blood. To summarize, I will borrow the words of Moliere: “An educated fool is more foolish than an ignorant one.”
Also, I must confess I know very little of how the economy or politics works except for its being a mess. I don’t think one can learn about these by just reading some books or theories. A life-time of observation and experience , perhaps, is more necessary.
Tan Nguyen
You’ve raised some good points. A university education does not guarantee the end of foolishness. As you said, “just look at how brilliant the leaders of the world are”. However, we mustn’t forget the influence of belief and ideology which you also refer to as being responsible for much of the world’s foolishness.
As well, most of the world’s leaders are unconscionable sociopaths. A university education just gives them more ammunition to to deceive and harm the rest of us.
Also important are the courses one takes in university. I found a sociology course in statistical analysis and methodology extremely useful in seeing through the statistical junk science the ass media feeds us. Other courses like economics (Keynesian) were totally useless. You’re also right in that observation and experience teaches much more than book learning. It took a career in business and a lifetime (60 years) of observation for me to realize economics is mostly common sense once one separates it from the useless economic rhetoric being taught in university.
I appreciate your thoughts and the time you’ve taken to leave a comment.
Gerold
Thank you for clarifying a few points I’ve been thinking about. One question, how would one pronounce TNOAT? I’m partial to the “two note” pronounciation, but I didn’t originate the term.
Thanks for asking as I hadn’t really considered it. Ten-note is the way I see it but two-note will certainly do.